Terming Kashmir an international issue, several British members of Parliament on Wednesday called for international intervention to resolve the dispute, taking into consideration aspirations of Kashmiris.
Addressing an online international conference hosted by UK-based Jammu Kashmir Self-Determination Movement International, Azad Kashmir President Masood Khan sought cross-party action by British lawmakers to address the long-pending Kashmir issue.
“Indian Occupied Jammu and Kashmir is literally burning right now. Young men are losing their lives. Domicile rules would change the very nature and composition of occupied region…It would be too late if we take action next year or the year after because the imperialists would have annexed the territory to multiple means,” said Masood, urging a debate in Britain’s parliament and intense lobbying by British parliamentarians with the government of Prime Minister Boris Johnson.
“A cross-party meeting to build consensus on Kashmir would be helpful for Kashmiris,” he said, appealing to the UK to “avert a catastrophic war in the [South Asian] region which is on the horizon.”
Echoing the president’s concerns, British MP Andrew Gwynne, who is also chairman of Labour Friends of Kashmir, said it was worrying to see the “increasing tensions from India not just towards Pakistan but also China” and its implications for the geopolitics of the region.
“Kashmir is not a bilateral issue between India and Pakistan…But the reality is it [Kashmir] is an international issue as has been recognised by United Nations Security Council resolutions,” he insisted.
“No decision about what happens to the territory can be made without the involvement of Kashmiris.”
Noting that Kashmir is an issue “that should transcend party politics,” Gwynne said it was time to raise the issue of the new domicile law and human rights abuses in Occupied Kashmir with the UK Foreign Office and Commonwealth of Nations.
Gwynne’s colleague and Labour Party Deputy Leader Angela Rayner reiterated that her party’s position on the Kashmir dispute “has not changed.”
“To get lasting peace in Kashmir, we have to have discussions between the Pakistani and Indian governments,” she said, regretting that the British government was not speaking on human rights abuses and not helping dialogue happen between India and Pakistan.
“My position has always been to stand up for the people of Kashmir,” she maintained. “We [Labour Party] would continue to support that voices of Kashmiris are heard.”
Debbie Abrahams, British parliamentarian and chairperson of the All Parties Kashmir Parliamentary Group (APKPG) in Parliament, said she wanted to visit IOJ&K to get firsthand experience on the ground but the Indian government denied her permission.
“I regret that,” she added.
The APKPG is a cross-party parliamentarian group in Parliament that works for addressing human rights issues of Kashmiris.
Accompanied by her APKPG team, Abrahams recently visited Azad Kashmir, where she met people besides President Masood and other government functionaries.
“The UK has been under lockdown for the last 10 weeks… [but] Occupied Jammu and Kashmir has been under lockdown for the last 10 months,” she said, referring to the military lockdown imposed by India ahead of Aug 5 last year when New Delhi scrapped the autonomy of the disputed region and divided the territory into two centrally administered units.
Abrahams maintained that reorganisation of Occupied Kashmir post abrogation of Articles 370 and 35A was in “contravention of Article 49 of the Geneva Convention as well as UN Security Council resolutions.”
“We need to be mindful of that,” she noted.
There are over 11 resolutions at the UN calling for the right to self-determination in the Jammu and Kashmir region that existed before India and Pakistan became independent nations in 1947.
However, they are yet to be implemented to decide the political future of the disputed region divided by Line of Control between the two countries.
Expressing concern over the raging conflict between India and China in the Ladakh area of Kashmir, Abrahams said that “based on the rule of law and on human rights, [the international community] has failed to act. It is really a travesty of [justice].”
“The seriousness of this [Kashmir] issue has really been ignored,” she said, expressing regret that two Security Council meetings on Kashmir after Aug 5 last year “concluded without any outcome”.
Insisting that the Kashmiri people were at the heart of the dispute, Abrahams said: “Action is needed from all of the international community to bring all parties together.”